Skip to Content

As Others See Us

Paul Kobulnicky
Director, University Libraries

Many of you will recall that the library recently undertook its first major survey of the UConn faculty, seeking your opinions about the quality of library collections and services. Nearly forty percent of the faculty responded. As I write, in early February, we have available to us the raw scores for the questions and answers on the survey and we have, listed anonymously, the comments that respondents sent us. We are now analyzing the data received and running important correlations that will give us more precise information. A preliminary report of general conclusions may be found inside the newsletter, but let me share with you here a few of the common responses we received.

"Need more journals.
Need more journals.
Need more journals."
Our collections are not what faculty would like them to be.
This is reflected most clearly in comments made about the
inadequacy of our journal holdings. It is also an issue that
is exacerbated by two other factors.
"One of my students found
twelve ...resources for a
paper on The Grapes of
Wrath using our electronic
indices. The library has
one of them."
The tools of bibliographic inquiry and our user's access to
those tools have both improved dramatically. Students and
faculty have on-line access to citations to the world's
literature and, armed with relevant citations, they now want
to get the actual documents. Clearly, we have raised
expectations.
"I know that you cannot
make bricks without
straw!"
However, inflation in the cost of books and journals
continues to erode our purchasing power for local
collection development. Thus, we do not always have the
items that faculty and students can identify
bibliographically. For that which we do not own, we direct
our clients to Interlibrary Loan.
"ILL office is great!
Could use more resources."
Demand for interlibrary loans has increased dramatically,
both at UConn and at other research libraries. Rapid, on-
demand delivery of journal articles, in place of
subscriptions to expensive journals, offers real hope to
improve access to more of the world's literature within the
limits of our budget. If, through self-service document
delivery for the more common books and journals, we can
stem the tide of activity that currently swamps the ILL
office, then ILL staff can continue to provide quality
service in the search for less easily obtained items.
"The photocopier situation
is particularly disgraceful."
When we do own what our clients need, the line forms at
the copy machines. We are aware of the poor state of our
photocopy equipment and, at the time of the survey, had
placed orders for several new machines. We hope they will
be in place by the time you read this.
"...the work I'm doing
would be impossible
without the helpful library
personnel...Hats off! I'm
doing the best work of my
life thanks to you all."
Of the many comments we received, I was most heartened
to read those that complimented library staff for their
service and dedication. Clearly, if the Libraries are to be
successful, it will be because of the efforts that individual
staff undertake to maintain close, collaborative, working
relationships with faculty and other library users.
"I am cheered by the fact
that this survey is being
done."
So am I.

Please see the following article for a summary of the general findings from the faculty library survey. Contact Paul Kobulnicky at 486-2219.

Back to the Table of Contents

This page is maintained by Suzanne Zack