|
ANNOUNCING
THE |
|
|
**TAKE A LOOK
AT THE GlobalEd PROJECT |
|
Gender, Technology and Group Decision-Making:
An Experimental Study in Secondary Education International Studies Programs

Mark A.
Boyer (Political Science) and Scott W. Brown (Educational
Psychology)
University of Connecticut, Co-Principal Investigators
Funded by a three-year grant from the U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
Click here for information about the Training Workshop held at UConn-Storrs, June 25-28, 2001
Click here to Apply for the $500 Teacher Innovation Budgets
Project Summary
The importance of the proposed project is based on the following observed phenomena:
- the prevalence and dominance of men in high level decision-making roles in government and business and the implications gender differences may have for decision-making and negotiation outcomes in those venues;
- the growing pervasiveness of technology in interpersonal and transnational communication and in educational environments and the impacts it has on the educational experiences of both genders.
- differences in substantive interests and career paths chosen by the genders and how the educational environment may foster these differences.
- the growing of conflict resolution strategies in government, business and throughout the world and how different approaches brought to these problems may be hindered or helped by the different leadership and decision-making approaches of men and women.
The series of experiments are aimed at investigating the emergence and solidification of gender-tied leadership and decision-making styles in secondary school age groups and to test the role played by cross-gender interaction in decision-making and its outcomes on issues ranging from arms control to international political economy and environmental affairs. The project will allow us to better understand:
- the implications of gender mixes in educational settings dealing with a range of contemporary economic, social and political issues;
- the longer-term implications such differences may have on our next generation of governmental, educational and business leaders; and
- how we can better structure today's classrooms so that both genders will show greater openness than may exist today to alternative strategies for problem-solving and conflict resolution at interpersonal and international levels.